All of the emoticons available on this forum are shown beside the reply message window. I might add others if I like them but I am very unlikely to add the standard smileys, because I loathe them.in another post, CAM wrote: Is there a way to get more emoticons?
Is there a way to get more emoticons?
-
- registered
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Thu 14 Oct, 2004 8:56 am
Is there a way to get more emoticons?
- forum administrator (aka llizard)
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 10:51 pm
I know the answer!!




Clearly, it's a cow doing the hula hoop!
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 10:51 pm
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 10:51 pm
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 10:51 pm
ah, not imagining things after all
I think I like the new cow better.llizard wrote:I think this is better now....
I hope it is still recognizable. Here is the older version beside the new version. Which is preferred?
![]()
![]()
![]()

-
- registered
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun 17 Oct, 2004 7:50 pm
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 10:51 pm
Lawless in Lotusland wrote:ARe there any rules about this that I might try to break?

It's all a matter of interpretation about what emotions, if any, the animals are representing. As for rules you might want to try to break, why would you care? I would have thought the lawless would just go ahead and do whatever they pleased. Or is lawlessness not the same as anarchy?
-
- registered
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun 17 Oct, 2004 7:50 pm
What is the fun of being lawless if there are no rules to break? I think lawlessness is different from anarchism. Anarchists think there should be no laws. Lawless people don't have any such principles. Or perhaps I am mixing up "lawlessness" (having no laws) with "lawbreaking."llizard wrote:Lawless in Lotusland wrote:ARe there any rules about this that I might try to break?![]()
It's all a matter of interpretation about what emotions, if any, the animals are representing. As for rules you might want to try to break, why would you care? I would have thought the lawless would just go ahead and do whatever they pleased. Or is lawlessness not the same as anarchy?